I have been putting off mentioning this for fear of outrunning the big Other and getting burned, but T&T Clark has offered me a book contract for a revised version of my dissertation, under the title Politics of Redemption: The Social Logic of Salvation.
I am breaking my silence because my editor has asked me about a potential cover image, and I need help. Everyone agrees that something featuring the devil is absolutely essential, and I’m thinking there must be some medieval painting that would capture the spirit of my project in some oblique way. Anthony suggested the image above, which he got from this post, but I think it might be a little “much.”
I’m not sure I necessarily want something with the cross on it, though I’m not 100% sold on its absence — perhaps something like a “temptation in the desert” scene? Or maybe — and this is actually a good idea that I just suddenly thought of — something that juxtaposes the temptation of Adam and Eve with the temptation of Christ? Basically, anything that could include Adam, Christ, and the Devil would be totally perfect.


Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 10:09 am
http://www.wga.hu/art/d/duccio/buoninse/maesta/predel_v/pre_v_c1.jpg
Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 10:17 am
I also found this one just now:
http://www.newmancause.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/631px-duccio_-_the_temptation_on_the_mount-450×427.jpg
Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 10:17 am
HA! They’re the same image.
Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 10:25 am
What I like about this one is the inclusion of the city — seems to fit with the “political” theme.
Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 10:41 am
Will the intial dissetation be beefed out in any way to emphasise the politics of all this, or is the ontology already the politics?
Congratulation also!
Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 10:43 am
It was already sufficiently beefed in that regard, in my opinion.
The problem I’m seeing with this image is that Jesus is white and the devil is black. Which is probably going to be a constant.
Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 11:01 am
Here’s the marriage of Adam & Eve alongside the temptation… seems to be a theme in some medieval manuscripts. No Christ, though, unless he’s officiating on the left.
The information on it is here… scroll down to p.30.
Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 11:03 am
…it may not have a city (or an atonement), but it seems to juxtapose the social with the individual.
Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 11:11 am
Congrats on the offer.
Does the devil in Anthony’s picture have a face on its ass, too? I don’t have my glasses on, so I’m squinting, but it sure looks like it to me.
I like that picture, but I am having trouble picturing it on the front of the book. It includes the city, too, but you might want to try to go with something more “spread out” like the first one mentioned in the comments.
Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 11:12 am
You can click for a larger image! All my comments in this thread have been about the image Colin and I both linked in the comments.
Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 12:49 pm
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b1/Ladder_of_Divine_Ascent_Sinai_12th_century.jpg
But this may suggest a little too much RO.
the black devil thing may well turn out to be a constant. I have certainly found demons explicitly called “ethiopians” as early as the fourth century. That’s not to say this doesn’t happen earlier.
Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 1:19 pm
Dave,
Yes he does. Which is why I liked the image so much.
What’s more offensive? Ass-face devil or black devil?
Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 1:26 pm
I think black devil is more offensive. So, I cast my vote for ass-face devil.
Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 1:36 pm
I sent something to my editor linking to the black devil one, saying what I liked about it and asking whether it could be the basis for some original image — also mentioned my preferences stated in the post. Maybe they’ll be able to come up with something — but I also told him I’d send along any further good ideas, so keep it coming.
Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 1:44 pm
I assume in the original image the devil could be made white and Jesus could be made black?
Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 2:11 pm
If the colors could be switched I’d switch my vote. Also, if there cannot be a face on Satan’s ass, would it possible to put an ass on an angel’s face?
Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 2:12 pm
Ass-face devil sounds like a sweet title for a blog…
I do like the idea of using the picture that Colin linked, but without the black devil. Black devil is definitely more offensive that ass-face devil, which is just kind of juvenile (seriously, though, I wonder what the logic was for that?) I’ll keep searching for more.
Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 2:18 pm
Maybe if they could just turn the devil the traditional red, it’d be okay.
Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 2:18 pm
I’d like to see Colin’s picture updated to a more 20th century setting, which the angels perhaps replaced with “humanity”, as per the solidarity implied by you account of the atonement.
Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 2:22 pm
Okay, what if the two angels are replaced by Adam and Eve?
Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 2:23 pm
I also like the modernization idea.
Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 3:23 pm
Found this that might be interesting:
http://www.marius-deromanus.net/images/art/temptationchrist.jpg
Also, perhaps a split-screen motif with this image in one corner:
http://humanflowerproject.com/images/uploads/sistine-adam-and-eve.jpg
And in the other corner (maybe diagonally) Colin’s pic…
I also just love this one:
http://a2.vox.com/6a00cd971973d74cd500e398bd50520003-500pi
Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 3:28 pm
I have been pressing Adam to go with this classic rendition of the Adversary.

Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 3:28 pm
Even better! Perhaps we can crowd-source an artist for you…maybe you could update the post along these lines…
Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 4:24 pm
I’m dropping everything and going with Brad’s.
Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 10:41 pm
Well, no image of Adam, but this pic does provide a pretty good representation of a Jesus-figure being tempted by a (white) devil:
http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0c52fV61YF2J4/610x.jpg
Friday, December 18, 2009 at 4:45 am
Okay, as a medievalist, I have to chime in. The first image, I have to say, is very overused (including as the cover for a recent Baker Academic book), and I’d suggest finding something else. Here are few interesting I found pretty quickly off the British Library’s manuscript image database:
1. A tree of vices, stemming from Adam and Eve’s fall (c. 1310)
http://www.imagesonline.bl.uk/results.asp?image=012370&imagex=11&searchnum=4
2. Adam and Eve banished from Paradise (c. 1320-30)
http://www.imagesonline.bl.uk/results.asp?image=026916&imagex=15&searchnum=4
3. Temptation of Christ (c. early 13th c.)
http://www.imagesonline.bl.uk/results.asp?image=072766&imagex=50&searchnum=0005
4. Christ before Pilate (c. 1270)
http://www.imagesonline.bl.uk/results.asp?image=073315&imagex=193&searchnum=0006
Friday, December 18, 2009 at 10:05 am
I easily like Nic’s number 3 above (Temptation of Christ) the best.
Friday, December 18, 2009 at 10:45 pm
[...] Criticism of Heaven and Earth, In the Vale of Tears, Irreligious Criticism | Leave a Comment Adam Kotsko gave me an idea for crowdsourcing. I have been toying with some thoughts for the title of the final [...]
Saturday, December 19, 2009 at 3:02 pm
I am throwing it out there, but I would like to use it for my own book cover some day: Andres Serranno’s Piss Christ.
Monday, June 7, 2010 at 7:33 am
[...] to all those who suggested images. Please also note that the book is available for preorder through either Continuum or [...]