Recently I’ve had the occasion to tell a few different people who were not theologically educated what my dissertation was about. “Atonement theory” is not a very intuitive term, obviously, and people are often taken by surprise that arguably the central question of Christianity — why was Christ’s incarnation, death, and resurrection the necessary means of salvation? — has never received the same kind of “official” answer that questions about Christ’s precise relationship to God have. Thus telling someone about the topic in a more casual setting can easily lead to more detailed explanation than is appropriate.
Thinking it through over the last few days, however, I believe I have finally come up with an elegant and economical way to introduce the topic to a generally educated audience: “As you may be able to tell, Jesus has always been something of a solution in search of a problem…”

Monday, May 14, 2012 at 9:12 am
“And of course, when all you have is a Roman with a hammer …”
Monday, May 14, 2012 at 9:22 am
Wow, too soon!
Monday, May 14, 2012 at 10:13 am
Adam, please do say more; it sounds fascinating.
Monday, May 14, 2012 at 10:39 am
Here’s a description. My dissertation was also published under the title Politics of Redemption, available wherever fine books are sold.
Monday, May 14, 2012 at 10:43 pm
You could take the underpants gnomes route
1: Jesus dies and raises from the dead
2: ? (atonement theory)
3: salvation
Monday, May 21, 2012 at 3:18 am
^Quite possibly the best way of looking at atonement theory.