I can’t believe I read the whole thing

It’s been a long time since we’ve criticized one of Milbank’s interventions, and his seemingly infinitely long piece on gay marriage may present a good opportunity.

On one point, we agree: “In effect, if marriage is now understood as a lifelong sexual contract between any two adult human persons with no specification of gender, then the allowance of gay marriage renders all marriages ‘gay marriages.'” Yet the conclusion he draws from this is strange, involving an idiosyncratic definition of “clear-thinking”: “Given such a situation, were it not for the space afforded by canon law (namely, the possibility of church marriage) a resort to cohabitation – which has hitherto been understood as ‘common-law marriage’ – would be the only logical path for clear-thinking Christians.”

3 Responses to “I can’t believe I read the whole thing”

  1. JP Says:

    Do you see that an Alastair is commenting on the article? Is he up to his old tricks?

  2. alastairjroberts Says:

    Actually, I am the ‘Alastair’ in question.

Comments are closed.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 5,004 other followers